$theTitle=wp_title(" - ", false); if($theTitle != "") { ?>
In: Culture
Do you agree? I’m not sure how Bukowski doesn’t at least overlap with Mouth, and Joyce smack in the middle?
Here’s another version:
mg
September 17th, 2011 at 20:41
I disagree with the second one entirely that Whitman is boring. He’s only boring if you don’t have a soul.
And where is Shakespeare in the first one? If anyone belongs in the center, it’s him!
Raphael
September 17th, 2011 at 20:58
I disagree with the second one with anyone being both boring and exciting at the same time.
And nobody can be funny and sad at the same time? Wasn’t that the whole point of everything Mark Twain ever wrote?
These graphs are both pretty clumsy.
lam
September 21st, 2011 at 11:42
Milton is simply classified as boring? I wonder what kind of shallow life a person leads where all literature can be put under those four categories. And how is Hemingway boring? I can’t think of a more to-the-point author.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.
3 Responses to Author Venn
mg
September 17th, 2011 at 20:41
I disagree with the second one entirely that Whitman is boring. He’s only boring if you don’t have a soul.
And where is Shakespeare in the first one? If anyone belongs in the center, it’s him!
Raphael
September 17th, 2011 at 20:58
I disagree with the second one with anyone being both boring and exciting at the same time.
And nobody can be funny and sad at the same time? Wasn’t that the whole point of everything Mark Twain ever wrote?
These graphs are both pretty clumsy.
lam
September 21st, 2011 at 11:42
Milton is simply classified as boring? I wonder what kind of shallow life a person leads where all literature can be put under those four categories. And how is Hemingway boring? I can’t think of a more to-the-point author.