In: Politics Source: NYT
Based on their viability prospects:
Thanks to David Cramer for passing it on!
googuse
August 23rd, 2011 at 12:43
Trump and Bachmann should be in their own “questionable sanity” sphere.
Mike Liveright
August 23rd, 2011 at 18:29
I like the Venn diagram, though I would disagree with the placing of Paul and Bachmann. The polls indicate they they would have a good chance now of winning.
Also, I’d re-name the “Interested in Running” as “NOW a declared candidate”
Doug
August 23rd, 2011 at 21:46
You forgot NJ Gov. Chris Christie. I would put him right next to Mitch Daniels.
Scott from Ohio
August 24th, 2011 at 22:59
What, no Cain, Johnson or Santorum? All three of them have shown up to at least one debate.
Roanman
August 27th, 2011 at 10:41
The notion of the New York Times passing judgement on anyone’s electability is absurd.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.
5 Responses to Republican Candidates Venn Diagram
googuse
August 23rd, 2011 at 12:43
Trump and Bachmann should be in their own “questionable sanity” sphere.
Mike Liveright
August 23rd, 2011 at 18:29
I like the Venn diagram, though I would disagree with the placing of Paul and Bachmann. The polls indicate they they would have a good chance now of winning.
Also, I’d re-name the “Interested in Running” as “NOW a declared candidate”
Doug
August 23rd, 2011 at 21:46
You forgot NJ Gov. Chris Christie. I would put him right next to Mitch Daniels.
Scott from Ohio
August 24th, 2011 at 22:59
What, no Cain, Johnson or Santorum? All three of them have shown up to at least one debate.
Roanman
August 27th, 2011 at 10:41
The notion of the New York Times passing judgement on anyone’s electability is absurd.