Religion, Income, and Education
In: Culture
19 May 2011
Comment Form
What is Chart Porn?
An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.
Categories
- Bailout (118)
- Chartporn Related (3)
- Commentary (21)
- Culture (669)
- Emerging Markets (66)
- Employment (245)
- Environment/weather (133)
- Finance (298)
- Food (92)
- Global Economy (373)
- Graphic Design (bad) (26)
- Graphic Design (general) (183)
- Graphic Tools (23)
- History (158)
- Housing (162)
- Humor (204)
- Innovative (183)
- Interactive (545)
- Internet/tech (97)
- Maps (578)
- News Media (34)
- Politics (329)
- Reference (97)
- Science (331)
- Source: Economist (101)
- Source: FT (92)
- Source: NYT (147)
- Source: Ritholtz (76)
- Source: USA Today (27)
- Source: Washington Post (90)
- Source: WSJ (135)
- Sports (58)
- Stock Market (74)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Updated regularly (76)
- US Economy (553)
- Video (22)
- Aram Korevaar: This chart is now being used as a projection in which countries such as China see themselves as in a [...]
- David: Welcome back Chart Porn! [...]
- J S: Thanks for the great story. Miss reading this blog. Hope to see you more active again. [...]
- jake: I lived in a DC row house for 6 years, and I'm writing this comment from my tiny 1 bedroom apartment [...]
- ronny pettersen: Hilarious and unfortunately accurate... ;-) [...]
5 Responses to Religion, Income, and Education
Sarah Myers
May 19th, 2011 at 10:51
Is it just me, or do the color, while pretty, make it more confusing? I kept trying to figure out what the color was trying to tell me, but I guess it’s just acting and a replacement for gridlines.
Matt
May 19th, 2011 at 11:37
Where are the non-religious?
Kevin
May 19th, 2011 at 16:13
@Sarah – Agreed on the unnecessary colours.
@Matt – ‘secular’ is one of the categories.
Elle P.
May 20th, 2011 at 01:58
NYT posted a correction for secular, placing their income firmly where one would expect based on education.
Elle P.
May 20th, 2011 at 01:59
The NYT posted a correction for secular, placing their income firmly where one would expect based on education:
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2011/05/15/magazine/15-Leonhardt.html