In: Politics Source: NYT
Based on their viability prospects:
Thanks to David Cramer for passing it on!
googuse
August 23rd, 2011 at 12:43 pm
Trump and Bachmann should be in their own “questionable sanity” sphere.
Mike Liveright
August 23rd, 2011 at 6:29 pm
I like the Venn diagram, though I would disagree with the placing of Paul and Bachmann. The polls indicate they they would have a good chance now of winning.
Also, I’d re-name the “Interested in Running” as “NOW a declared candidate”
Doug
August 23rd, 2011 at 9:46 pm
You forgot NJ Gov. Chris Christie. I would put him right next to Mitch Daniels.
Scott from Ohio
August 24th, 2011 at 10:59 pm
What, no Cain, Johnson or Santorum? All three of them have shown up to at least one debate.
Roanman
August 27th, 2011 at 10:41 am
The notion of the New York Times passing judgement on anyone’s electability is absurd.
Your Name (required)
Your Email (required)
Your URL
An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.
5 Responses to Republican Candidates Venn Diagram
googuse
August 23rd, 2011 at 12:43 pm
Trump and Bachmann should be in their own “questionable sanity” sphere.
Mike Liveright
August 23rd, 2011 at 6:29 pm
I like the Venn diagram, though I would disagree with the placing of Paul and Bachmann. The polls indicate they they would have a good chance now of winning.
Also, I’d re-name the “Interested in Running” as “NOW a declared candidate”
Doug
August 23rd, 2011 at 9:46 pm
You forgot NJ Gov. Chris Christie. I would put him right next to Mitch Daniels.
Scott from Ohio
August 24th, 2011 at 10:59 pm
What, no Cain, Johnson or Santorum? All three of them have shown up to at least one debate.
Roanman
August 27th, 2011 at 10:41 am
The notion of the New York Times passing judgement on anyone’s electability is absurd.