Crappy Sexist Magazines: Maxim vs Cosmo
In: Culture
25 Jan 2011Darren Barefoot compared the words that appeared on the covers of three years of Maxim magazine to three years of Cosmopolitan. Can you tell which of the below are which?
His post identifies several interesting observations, as do the related comments over at Sociological Images.
For comparison, here is a cloud from Cosmopolitan in the 1970s:
Comment Form
What is Chart Porn?
An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.
Categories
- Bailout (117)
- Chartporn Related (21)
- Commentary (21)
- Culture (626)
- Emerging Markets (66)
- Employment (235)
- Environment/weather (118)
- Finance (296)
- Food (85)
- Global Economy (368)
- Graphic Design (bad) (17)
- Graphic Design (general) (161)
- Graphic Tools (20)
- History (128)
- Housing (158)
- Humor (189)
- Innovative (176)
- Interactive (519)
- Internet/tech (81)
- Maps (520)
- News Media (33)
- Politics (311)
- Reference (90)
- Science (298)
- Source: Economist (100)
- Source: FT (92)
- Source: NYT (143)
- Source: Ritholtz (76)
- Source: USA Today (27)
- Source: Washington Post (73)
- Source: WSJ (135)
- Sports (48)
- Stock Market (73)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Updated regularly (75)
- US Economy (542)
- Video (13)
- Mike: My major quibble is the video flips between income and wealth as if they're interchangeable. You can [...]
- David: Who else wants to tell the Copyright Alert System people to go fuck themselves? [...]
- Carl: Very interesting video. The angle that is never shown in videos and graphs like these is the change [...]
- Maria Droujkova: What is lacking: - The percentage of vaccinated (low for some of listed diseases) - The incidence [...]
- escort madrid: Someone who habitually doubts accepted beliefs about the vaccine data, for those people it is really [...]
1 Response to Crappy Sexist Magazines: Maxim vs Cosmo
alli
March 2nd, 2011 at 10:50 am
I am disturbed by the fact that Maxim is using the term girl and not woman. Using the term “girls” in a publication that overtly sexualizes females is creepy.