Brain Size and Diet

In: Science

8 Nov 2012

I love these evolutionary causation theories.

A study published yesterday in the journal PNAS puts weight behind the hypothesis that–more than any social or environmental factor–humans own their giant cognitive leap to the ancestral chefs and proto grill masters who invented cooked food.

Why? According to the researchers, a diet of raw foods can’t support an endless growth of both brawn and brains. Larger body sizes and bigger brains both meant more energy use, which meant more time spent eating each day.

And, since no primate can sustain a daily foraging requirement of much more than eight hours (gorillas average close to eight, but sometimes spend closer to nine), our ancestors must have found some way to get more energy in less time.

I don’t know that I buy the summary argument, but viewing “time spent getting calories” as a driver of intelligence and socialization selection is intriguing.

Thanks to Will T. for sending in the link!

1 Response to Brain Size and Diet



November 16th, 2012 at 11:05 am

The use of the brains to convey an additional dimension of data is nice, but it spoils the comparison between what looks like a curve flattening out around 8 hours for the monkeys, and one that diverges for the Homo lineage.

which is much of the point.

Comment Form

What is Chart Porn?

An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.

  • An Opinion: @Someone - you are either a very subtle satirist, or a very uninformed person. [...]
  • An Opinion: When you're disparaging the communications techniques of someone whose message is nearly universally [...]
  • Dan: It doesn't take into account where the shore is angled to(or with the most probability to be angled [...]
  • Someone: Where are the dead killed by Terrorists? [...]
  • Raphael: Also, it looks a lot like the Treasure Island casino logo, after their recent rebranding as "ti" [...]