Here’s an example of how more isn’t always better. Compare the interactive presentation of retail sales data below to the static version – both from the Wall Street Journal. In my opinion the static version presents the information in a much clearer and usable format. The only thing it’s missing is a chart for “total retail sales”. Regarding the interactive version, I’ve never liked stacked bar charts over time unless they illustrate very clear trends – with this many similar segments I think they are pretty silly (though the ability to drill down does alleviate this a smidgeon).  (related article)

image

image

2 Responses to Retail Sales

Avatar

Scott K

January 16th, 2012 at 12:20 pm

Where is the second graphic from?

Avatar

Jon Peltier

January 16th, 2012 at 11:59 pm

The problem with interactive charts is that often the designers hide information behind interactive actions, while the same interaction is presented in static charts. For example, instead of seeing multiple series in the chart (multiple lines, or stacked columns, or whatever) you can only see one series at a time, and when you make another appear, the one you were looking at disappears. Now how am I supposed to remember the data that vanished?

Comment Form

What is Chart Porn?

An addictive collection of beautiful charts, graphs, maps, and interactive data visualization toys -- on topics from around the world.

  • Acheter Longchamp Le Pliage: Acheter Longchamp Le Pliage,formes Longchamp de coachingle coaching,Sac Longchamp Pliage Taille L,fo [...]
  • Danielle: This is so beautiful! [...]
  • Steven Rios: That's amazing, how you do that? [...]
  • Sumit Thakur: Nice graph.I never though that Boston will be in this list... [...]
  • Tom bertsch: I would like to see a sphere representing all the Tootsie rolls ever eaten! Just the chocolate ones! [...]