<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheism on the Rise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/</link>
	<description>data visualizations and charts you just gotta love.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infographer &#187; некачественная инфографика</title>
		<link>http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Infographer &#187; некачественная инфографика</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] пример плохого дизайна, почерпнутый с ресурса Chart Porn. Заголовок &#171;Атеизм растет&#187; некачественная [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] пример плохого дизайна, почерпнутый с ресурса Chart Porn. Заголовок &laquo;Атеизм растет&raquo; некачественная [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/#comment-596</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused as to why &quot;baptist&quot; is a separate category.  Which leads me to question not only how informative the &quot;generic&quot; and &quot;mainline&quot; labels are, but how informative the visualization (without all the noise) would be.

It would seem to me that if you were trying to facilitate the generation of wisdom about religious sects, then you would show &quot;Christian&quot; compared to Muslim, None, and Jewish - and then if the Christian graph was significantly larger than the others, you&#039;d break that out in a separate display within which you&#039;d show break down via sect.

Perhaps you&#039;d even take the trouble to break out &quot;None&quot; into Atheist and Agnostic, as well.

Either way, it seems like the information is subservient to the visual &quot;joke&quot; - meant to hopefully offend at least two of the religions represented?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused as to why &#8220;baptist&#8221; is a separate category.  Which leads me to question not only how informative the &#8220;generic&#8221; and &#8220;mainline&#8221; labels are, but how informative the visualization (without all the noise) would be.</p>
<p>It would seem to me that if you were trying to facilitate the generation of wisdom about religious sects, then you would show &#8220;Christian&#8221; compared to Muslim, None, and Jewish &#8211; and then if the Christian graph was significantly larger than the others, you&#8217;d break that out in a separate display within which you&#8217;d show break down via sect.</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;d even take the trouble to break out &#8220;None&#8221; into Atheist and Agnostic, as well.</p>
<p>Either way, it seems like the information is subservient to the visual &#8220;joke&#8221; &#8211; meant to hopefully offend at least two of the religions represented?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartporn.org/2009/10/07/atheism-on-the-rise/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I took me awhile to realize there even WERE charts on this image.

You know what would have been cool?  If the point of view was facing the people at the bar and they had beer or something that was filled to different levels with labels indicating the significance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I took me awhile to realize there even WERE charts on this image.</p>
<p>You know what would have been cool?  If the point of view was facing the people at the bar and they had beer or something that was filled to different levels with labels indicating the significance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.295 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 17:43:27 -->

